23 Muharram 1435 – 27 November 2013
SANHA – THE DESPERATION OF “THE SCHOLARS FOR DOLLARS”
Unable to tolerate the Haqq which Mufti A.K.Hoosen has proclaimed regarding SANHA’s halaalizing of carrion chickens, the Lockkhat-Naulakhi cabal of SANHA has threatened haraam kuffaar-style legal action against Mufti A.K.Hoosen. In furtherance of its haraam and inordinate appétite for Hibb-e-Jah, and to sustain its carrion industry for ensuring the inflow into its coffers of haraam boodle, the carrion clique has clambered down into the dregs of the barrel of dishonour in its nefarious and disgusting attempt to enlist even the molvi students of Mufti A.K.Hoosen to come out in opposition and condemnation of their Ustaadh. Towards this end, the carrion cabal of SANHA has sent out a letter (reproduced hereunder) to the phantom it terms its ‘ulama council’ for rubber-stamping.
In the despicable nafsaani bid to bring disrepute to Mufti A.K.Hoosen for having declared the Haqq of SANHA’s haraam carrion chickens, the Lockhat-Naulakhi cabal has demanded from its inept, incompetent rubber-stamping ‘ulama council’ that its members sign the condemnatory letter which SANHA is shoving down their throats.
It should be noted that two names appearing on the letter, are the students of Mufti A.K.Hoosen. They are Moulana Ismail Allie and Moulana Junaid Adam. The name of another student of Mufti A.K.Hoosen, namely, Moulana Yusuf Patel, does not appear on the letter. In a letter to his Ustaadh, Moulana Yunus Patel has apologized.
While it is Islamically not expected and while it is haraam for students to be a party to condemnatory and haraam kuffaar legal action against their Ustaadh, this is quite possible as far as Scholars for Dollars are concerned. Dollars, like haraam sexual lust, deaden the brain cells and blinds the spiritual vision, hence these students are capable of bearing their haraam fangs in the face of their Ustaadh.
Another extremely despicable and disgusting dimension of this episode is that while SANHA publicly professes to be acting under the directives of its phantom ‘ulama council’, the members of this disreputable carrion council are actually being used and misused to rubber stamp all the carrion activities of SANHA’s cabal who dictates the terms to its underling so-called ‘ulama’.
The letter has simply been thrust into the faces of the molvis whose names appear thereon with the instruction to sign it. There was no consultation with them. They are simply required to sign whether they agree or not with the hash written by the SANHA carrion clique. So far, the letter has not been signed. It is hoped that at least the students of Mufti A.K.Hoosen will have some intelligence and refuse to be a party to the cabal’s proposed haraam condemnatory and legal action against their Ustaadh. They should understand that the effect of treachery against the Ustaadh is spiritual disaster.
THE LETTER WHICH THE CARRION CABAL DEMANDS
THAT IT BE SIGNED BY ITS PHANTOM ‘ULAMA COUNCIL’
Mr Shamsheer Khan
The Station Manager
Channel Islam International
Respected Brother in Islam
The recent condemnation of SANHA’s certification of commercially slaughtered birds by Mufti AK Hoosen on his Q & A programme has caused widespread disillusionment and disappointment within the Ulama and broader Muslim community. This is not on account of airing a different opinion on the commercial slaughter of chickens but rather because of the discourteous and impolite manner of expressing his views. His answer to a simple question posed by a listener elicited a confrontational and hostile response unbecoming of a radio personality let alone a scholar of the Deen.
We as members of the Ulama Council of SANHA find the palpable misuse of the airwaves by yourselves insensitive and demeaning. The function of the Ulama Council which comprises of eight Ulama organizations is to develop and endorse operational procedures and policies of SANHA. The Ulama organizations have appointed a panel of Muftis to the SANHA Fatwa Committee which serves as it’s Shari’ah Advisory Board. Needless to mention that this service is offered at no cost and with no monetary benefit to any one of the eight Ulama organizations or their representatives. Your Mufti AK’s statement that “the maxim amounts of chickens are slaughtered so as to make the maximum amount of profit” is a slanderous accusation against the eight august Ulama organizations. We have been repeatedly assaulted with the ‘scholars for dollars’ refrain by Mufti AK.
We must reiterate that this is not an attempt to influence Mufti AK Hoosen so that he adopts a SANHA friendly posture, but rather an appeal for him to be courteous, respectful and dignified when airing his views even if they differ from the collective wisdom of eight Ulama organizations. As a Muslim community we can ill afford such forms of public derision at a time when the very identity of the Ummah is being challenged.
We are of the view that the silence of Cii’s management in the matter could be construed as unwittingly abetting to sow seeds of friction in the community.
We request you, in the interest of balance coverage, to give SANHA an equal right to respond and also ask that you read this message out on Cii’s airwaves.
The Ulama Council of SANHA
- Majlisud Da’wa wal Islah – Moulana Ismail Allie
- Jamiatul Ulama South Africa – Moulana Ebrahim I Bham
- Council of Ulama, Eastern Cape – Moulana Junaid Adam
- Darul Ihsan – Mufti Zubair Bhayat
- Darul Waqaf – Sheikh Ebrahim Essop
- Central Islamic Trust – Moulana Mohammed Suliman
- Northern Cape Halaal Board – Moulana Rafeek A Hassen
- Jamiatul Ulama Western Cape – Moulana Ighsaan Abrahams
(END OF THE CARRION CABAL’S LETTER)
DO THE STUDENTS DESIRE TO BE INDICTED FOR TREACHERY AGAINST THEIR USTAADH IN THE DIVINE COURT? IS THEIR FIRST ALLEGIANCE TO THEIR SPIRITUAL USTAADH OR TO THE CARRION LOCKHAT-NAULAKHI CABAL WHOSE PROFESSION IS MAITAH-HALAALIZATION?
|< Prev||Next >|